The Fairy Tale of Being Self Made

It is not uncommon to turn on the tv and see an interview with someone the host touts as a “self-made” billionaire.  The story is usually about how someone created some company or skill that earned them a billion dollars.  They did not inherit their billion dollars, so that makes them “self-made.”  Undoubtedly these efforts are remarkable, and a great display of effort.  The term “self-made” well I don’t know what to think about that.  Can anyone be a “self-made” anything?

The cults of personality like to build a myth around these “self-made” folks.  They say that they did it all on their own.  This person against the odds and without an inheritance did some great thing.  While this is true to a degree, I would say that none of these people did it alone.  While a lot of their success is due to their creativity, effort, and grit, everyone still has help.  Too often these cults of personality build up to the point where some “self-made” person is reported to have done everything on their own.  That they didn’t need anyone, they had it all within themselves.  These stories seem to me to be ego, legend making, and flat out lies.  I can admit being “self-made” does make a good story for a 5 minute television segment though, even if it is not true.

I can’t believe most people didn’t have help on their paths to success.  How is success even possible without help?  At the very least even if you are “self-made”  you had to have had some customers or clients.  At some point in time someone or a lot of someones had to decide to do some business with you instead of someone else.  These people made you, you’re not “self-made.”  Most businesses have multiple founders or some employees.  Steve Jobs wasn’t a “self-made” billionaire, Steve Wozniak made Steve Jobs, and Jobs made Wozniak.  Successes don’t happen in isolation.

People that are “self-made” and claim to have done it all on their own seem to be delusional to me.  They have lost touch with the true story of how they found their successes.  There could be a host of reasons for this.  Ego could be at play.  Narcissism could be at play at well.  They could also have just forgotten all the people that have helped them along the way.  Being “self-made” is a good story for the TV but its just a fairy tale.

Could believing this fairy tale lead us astray?  I am not a success, I have no money, and to become a success I must be “self-made.”  In some way I must be “self-made” in the ways people talk about being “self-made.”  I have no one from which to inherit millions.  I have no powerful friends that will drop success into my lap for me being a good guy.  I must be “self-made.”  My story of success must follow the path that many of these “self-made” people followed.  Believing the stories and legends though, that will lead me into places I don’t want to be.  I cannot believe I will do this success thing all on my own. 

I will never be a “self-made” success.  Thinking that I can do it all on my own is just poison.  There are too many people who have helped me already.  My parents have helped time and time again in so many ways, both profound and small.  At 35 years old, I am still getting constant help from my parents.  I have great friends that have shown kindness beyond anything I could deserve.  Before I was even born my grandparents were helping me by building and creating families that have given me so much support.  Being “self-made”, acting like I did ANYTHING in life by myself is a slap in the face to all these people.  I have been helped by so many people that I can’t even list them all or remember them all.  Taking credits for my successes, acting like I did them all, that is just something I can’t do.  There is so much credit that must go to others, I get so much help all the time.  Even if I could be “self-made” in any sense of the word, I wouldn’t want to be.

Even if I could make myself into something, into some sort of success all by myself, doing so would make me a moron.  I have so much help available to me.  I have great family, I have great friends, how could I not accept their support?  Their emotional support and friendship is of value beyond anything that could possibly be quantified.  Beyond that, there is so much help I could call on.  I could call upon others to be co-founders in a company with me.  I could go to writers groups where we help each other edit and shape our next books.  I could go to a coworking studio and bounce ideas off a hundred smart people.  Doing any of these things stops me from being “self-made.”  I can’t imagine wanting to be “self-made.” 

I think this thought can be transferred to other things.  Why would I want to be “self-taught” at anything when there is help available.  Yes, you can learn things on your own, and learning on your own is partially a part of the process.  There are resources and others available to you that will help you.  And even if you don’t use those resources, you still got help.  If you learned to program a computer, did you write the book you learned from?  Did you build the computer?  Did you smelt the iron to build the transistors?  Thinking we do things on our own, and that we are “self made” or “self-taught”  or “self-anything” what does that even mean?

Maybe thinking we did it on our own is a matter of ego.  Some people don’t want admit they had help.  Maybe we forgot who helped us along the way.  There can be a lot of solitude in our journeys, but that doesn’t mean we were ever alone.  We can play an instrumental role in our stories.  We can be the lead actor, but this is not a one man play.  Losing sight of that is to become something I don’t want to be.  I can’t imagine doing anything on my own or even trying to.  I can’t imagine how it is even possible.  I hope I never say I was “self-made” or let other people stick this title on me.  I don’t want to forget how things really happened.  Other people matter in my story.  My journey is not alone, and it never has been.

Applications of the Yerkes-Dodson Law

I put the minimal amount of effort into the blogpost I could.  Did I do this because I was lazy?  No, I was not lazy this time.  Since this blogpost is about mental arousal and how much is needed and optimal for a given task, I am attempting to write with the proper amount of arousal.  I could write with more intensity, but that might be an overly large amount of arousal applied.  Why am I trying to write with the minimal amount of mental arousal?  Well lately I have been thinking about the Yerkes-Dodson Law and the whole arousal curve for peak performance.

According to Wikepedia the Yerkes-Dodson Law states that “The law dictates that performance increases with physiological or mental arousal, but only up to a point. When levels of arousal become too high, performance decreases.” (Source)  My simple mind takes that to mean if I get too excited, then nothing useful is going to get done.  Other components of the law and research around it state that lower levels of arousal may be best for intellectually demanding tasks.  The theory also talks about the idea that different tasks have different optimal levels of arousal.  In general all this can be represented by a bell curve relationship, different tasks will however have different shaped bell curves.  There is some thought and research into the idea that different personalities may need different levels of arousal for peak performance.  Introverts seem do perform better with less arousal than extroverts for example. 

I don’t think about these facts often enough.  I like being a bit of a maniac, so my tendency is to try and pump myself up to do things more than I probably need to.  I feel as though myself and others would be well served to think more about where we are living on this arousal curve for the task at hand.  Knowing where we are on the curve, and knowing how to manipulate our position on the curve seems wise. 

For some tasks I seem to have mastered this moving along the curve and firing myself up to proper levels.  I can move my arousal up and down at will in the gym to lift heavy weights, all without getting too fired up and doing really stupid stuff.  With my more professional work tasks, I don’t move along this curve at will as easily.  When it comes to work I often attempt to just keep trying harder.

Trying harder seems to increase all the arousal symptoms.  It dumps more adrenaline at times it doesn’t need to be dumped and messes with cortisol too I suppose.  Instead of becoming more fired up, I think I tend to just flatline.  I don’t know if any of that is actually scientifically true, but it feels as though that is kind of what happens.  What I do know is that I should figure out how to be more conscious of how fired up I am while doing any given task, and then moving along that curve as needed to get to optimal performance levels.

Being introverted I suspect it would be useful for me to ratchet down the intensity in many things I do.  I can always crank it back up if I find the need to.  If my tasks are not going well I need to move one of the two directions though.  If one way doesn’t work, then well I should just try going the other direction until I know what proper mindset feels like for any task.  

In general I am very fired up to do well at the tasks I take on.  I want to succeed, I want to do a good job, and I am motivated to do such.  I suspect just by waking up and getting started on tasks I am rather close to being aroused enough to perform well.  My guess is too often I just pour gasoline onto a rather suitable fire and just make a mess of things. 

I could be wrong with all this, and I don’t even think that it matters.  I think the main point is it is good for me to find an optimal level of excitement to get things done well.  Knowing what this feels like and learning how to get to this state is undoubtedly a powerful skill to have at my command.  Whether the science is correct or not, if it is a useful frame to move forward then I will use it.  I am using the science to spur thought and experimentation, and that will go good places.

I feel like these are the things I should think about more often in my given day.  This blogpost flowed out easily.  This entire time writing this post I kept myself like mellow, and almost in a meditative like mojo.  Managing our own psychologies is important and this might just be one simple way to do that.

Managing your psychology can help one to be more focused, intentional and effective.  Without some degree of management, we are running around just doing stuff like zombies or maniacs, whatever we happen to be acting like that day.  Some people may do this automatically, others like me should probably think about these things more.  With more intentionality more can be taken from the day, rather than taking whatever just randomly happens.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yerkes%E2%80%93Dodson_law

https://hbr.org/2016/04/are-you-too-stressed-to-be-productive-or-not-stressed-enough

https://exploringyourmind.com/yerkes-dodson-law-performance-arousal/